Legal Opinion

Jensen v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1967PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Five issues are raised on this review. The first question is whether the trial court abused its dis*602cretion by not allowing alibi witnesses to testify for the defendant or by failing to adjourn the trial.

The alibi statute, sec. 955.07, Stats., is as follows:

“In courts of record, if the defendant intends to rely upon an alibi as a defense, he shall give to the district attorney written notice thereof on the day of arraignment, stating particularly the place where he claims to have been when the crime is alleged to have been committed together with the names and addresses of witnesses to his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gauthier v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Oseman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. SelbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Eaton v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Simos v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Taliaferro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. McClelland v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Lampkins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Strait v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API