Legal Opinion

Wold v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1973No. State 99PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The child testified that Wold took her walking with a little boy and a dog in a field behind a trailer court where she lived and committed acts which would constitute taking indecent liberties. The fact she was molested was substantiated by circumstantial evidence. A construction worker testified he saw Wold walking with a boy and a dog in the vicinity and at the time involved. The clothing of the child, her report to her mother as to what had happened, and the doctor’s examination all proved the child was molested. The child identified Wold by his residence in the trailer court as the person…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. State v. DyessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. StanislawskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Sumnicht v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. KuntzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Scales v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API