Legal Opinion

State v. Westcott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 30, 2016No. 15FE0185; A159548PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHUMAN, S. J.

Police in Redmond stopped defendant for a traffic violation and then extended the stop to conduct an investigation into whether defendant was in possession of contraband. The investigation led to the discovery of methamphetamine and defendant’s subsequent arrest and indictment. At a pretrial hearing, defendant filed a motion to suppress all of the evidence seized by the police during the extension of the stop, arguing that it amounted to detaining him without reasonable suspicion that he was involved in criminal activity, contrary to Article I, section 9, of the Oregon…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. HoldorfOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ReichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. State v. CageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State v. HollinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API