Legal Opinion
James v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 7, 2005No. A03-489PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This case arises from a postconviction court’s denial of Brian James’s postconviction petition to withdraw his guilty plea. James contends that because he was not informed of a statutorily mandated conditional release term before the conditional release term was actually imposed he is entitled to have either his plea withdrawn or his sentenced modified. The postcon-viction court denied James’s petition. On appeal, the court of appeals declined to reach the merits of James’s claims, held that James’s petition was not timely under Minn. R.Crim. P. 15.05, subd. 1, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anthony Correale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Alejandro Margalli-Olvera v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- United States v. Van ThournoutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. WhitfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Lussier v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Jacob Stephen Brown v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.