Legal Opinion

United States v. Marcos Amabiles Pena

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 12, 1998No. 97-2112PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Marcos Pena was convicted of possession with intent to distribute five grams or more of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B), and 18 U.S.C. § 2(a). Prior to trial, Pena filed a motion to suppress evidence, but the district court denied the motion. He appeals that denial, asserting that he did not consent to the search during which the police found the drugs that he was convicted of possessing, and that even if he did give his consent, the officers’ search exceeded the scope of his consent. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. McRaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Meekins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Marshall v. Columbia Lea Regional HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Lewis Samuel Gordon, Also Known as Chris JonstonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. PattenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. RosboroughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API