Schmidt v. DuBois

On behalf of the defendants it is argued that the plaintiffs should have intervened in the foreclosure action. Inasmuch as the entire matter is here upon the merits, it is considered that the questions raised should be disposed of.

On behalf of the plaintiffs it is argued that the trial court was of the opinion that the buildings could not properly be the subject of a chattel mortgage and it therefore erroneously concluded that the lien of plaintiffs’ mortgage was subordinate to that of the defendants’ mortgages. We find no warrant for that argument either in the findings of fact and…