Legal Opinion
Hartnett v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 16, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenblatt, J. P.
In this case and the companion appeal of Hartnett v New York City Tr. Auth. (200 AD2d 27 [decided herewith]), the Court is called upon, for the first time, to determine the appropriate time limitations for actions brought by the Commissioner of Labor pursuant to Labor Law § 27-a (10) (Public Employee Safety and Health Act [hereinafter the PESH Act]). In the companion appeal, we have addressed the question of which Statute of Limitations governs such an action, and, in that appeal, we have held that the three-year Statute of Limitations of CPLR 214 (2) is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sanders v. WinshipNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Grossman v. RankinNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Sullivan v. SiebertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Donovan v. Diplomat Envelope Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Donovan v. Peter Zimmer America, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hartnett v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Brooklyn Barber Beauty Equipment Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2001
- Goldstein v. New York State Industrial Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002