Legal Opinion
Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Brooklyn Barber Beauty Equipment Co.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided September 7, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Lucy Billings, J.
This action seeks to recover $38,202.41 in unpaid premiums for workers’ compensation insurance issued by the State Insurance Fund to defendants; $8,404.53 in collection costs (State Finance Law § 18 [5]); and interest from August 31, 1996 (State Finance Law § 18 [3], [4]). Defendant Pet Lift Ltd. moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against Pet Lift. (CPLR 3212 [b].) For the reasons explained below, the court denies Pet Lift’s motion.
I. Background
Upon the application of defendant Brooklyn Barber Beauty Equipment Co., Inc., in 1963, plaintiff…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Grasso v. AngeramiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Nassau Insurance v. MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Ayotte v. GervasioNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. SuarezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2016
- Mejia v. SantosNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- Brewster v. Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC.District Court, W.D. New York · 2025
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Photocircuits Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2003