Grossman v. Rankin
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Cooke, J.
This case presents a challenge by attorneys in the competí*499tive class of civil service to the exempt classification of the Assistant Corporation Counsel positions in the Law Department of the City of New York. At the time of the institution of this litigation, 278 attorneys in the Corporation Counsel’s Office were in the competitive class and 105 were classified as exempt. We hold that the positions under review were properly classified under the State Constitution and the Civil Service Law.
To begin with framework, the civil service in this State is divided into…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Matter of Andresen v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- People Ex Rel. Schau v. . McWilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Union Free School District No. 6 v. New York State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People Ex Rel. Finnegan v. . McBrideNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Chittenden v. . WursterNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Cove v. SiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Grossman v. SchwarzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- McGowan v. BursteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- King v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Dickinson v. DainesNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.