Hartnett v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenblatt, J. P.
In this case and the companion appeal of Hartnett v New York City Tr. Auth. (200 AD2d 20 [decided herewith]), the Court is called upon, for the first time, to determine the appropriate Statute of Limitations for actions brought by the Commissioner of Labor, pursuant to Labor Law § 27-a (10) (the Public Employee Safety and Health Act [hereinafter the PESH Act]). In the companion appeal, we have addressed the initial question of whether an employee’s failure to file a complaint with the Commissioner until more than 30 days after the discriminatory act…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Martin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Auletta v. TullyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hartnett v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- SW BY JW v. WarrenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Goldstein v. Time Warner New York City Cable GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Levine v. McCabeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Johnita M.D. v. David D.D.New York Supreme Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.