Legal Opinion
United States v. Perez De Dios
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 19, 2001No. 00-1193PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents two issues, one settled and the other not yet addressed in this Circuit. First, in a “reverse sting” by the police, is the defendant responsible, for the purpose of calculating drug quantity under the Guidelines, for the amount of drugs he agreed to buy from the seller-government agent, or is he responsible for only the amount of drugs actually contained in the “dummy” package? We are bound by United States Sentencing Guideline (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2D1.1, Application Note 12 and prior decisions of this Circuit to hold that in. a reverse sting the defendant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. HardwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Eric N. UngerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Richard Bruce CoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Richard F. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Bennie Ray HardemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. OverholtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Shane L. BorerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Ex Parte ThompsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- United States v. Dion A. Smack, A/K/A Dee Dion A. SmackCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Charles Rogers ColeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.