Legal Opinion

Hydro Resources, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 15, 2010No. 07-9506PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORSUCH, Circuit Judge,

joined by TACHA, KELLY, O’BRIEN, TYMKOVICH, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

Everyone agrees that Hydro Resources, Inc. (“HRI”) must obtain a Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA” or “the Act”) permit to mine its property. The only question is: from whom? The Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA” or the “Agency”), which administers the Act, has chosen to delegate its permitting authority in the State of New Mexico to the New Mexico Environment Department (“NMED”), but with one exception: EPA has not delegated its authority to issue permits for mining activities on “Indian lands.”…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Peterson v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Garling v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. Aposhian v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  4. Flood v. ClearOne Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation & EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API