Legal Opinion

Garling v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 7, 2017No. 16-8028PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHESON, Circuit Judge.

Roger Garling, Sheryl Garling, and their business, R and D Enterprises, Inc., (collectively, “the Garlings”) sued the United States for damages arising from an Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) raid and investigation of their laboratory. The district court held the Garlings’ action time-barred under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). The Garlings appeal, arguing the EPA’s conduct was a continuing tort or, alternatively, that they were entitled to equitable tolling.

Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we conclude that sovereign immunity barred the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. United States v. Gregory GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  2. Moore v. AndrenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Crow Creek Sioux Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  5. Ohlsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API