Stevens v. Fetterman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This action is by the plaintiff to remove a cloud, from the title to the real property described in the complaint and so to quiet his title thereto. Judgment passed for the plaintiff and the defendants appeal therefrom upon a bill of exceptions.
The controversy is the outgrowth of several transactions, involving, in so far at least as it is required to present a clear understanding of the situation as it is portrayed by the record, three different and distinct pieces of real estate. The real property described in the complaint and as to which relief is herein sought by the plaintiff was at one…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Henley v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Mahoney v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Goodfellow v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Rieger v. RichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Spataro v. DomenicoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Gronenschild v. RitzenthalerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.