Legal Opinion

Spataro v. Domenico

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1950No. Civ. 17073PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment for defendants in an action to have a grant deed, absolute in form, declared a mortgage, for an accounting, for a reconveyance of the properties to plaintiffs, and to quiet their title thereto.

The complaint, filed May 15, 1947, alleged that on March 15, 1938, plaintiffs, as security for a loan of $500, executed a grant deed to Domenico Domenico and Madalena Domenico, husband and wife, as joint tenants, covering two parcels of real property in Los Angeles County; that the "deed, though absolute in form, was intended and agreed by the parties to be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Baines v. ZuiebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. W. F. Boardman Co. v. PetchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Goodfellow v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Mansfield v. District Agricultural Ass'n Number SixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Munger v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Rizo v. MacBethAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Arsenian v. MeketarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Develop-Amatic Engineering v. REPUBLIC MORTGAGECalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Townsend v. WinglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API