In the Matter of Nida
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary matter, Respondent, Laurence Harmon Nida, is charged with numerous violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The Panel recommended a private reprimand; the Executive Committee adopted the Panel’s findings but recommended a 90-day suspension.
After careful review of the record, we find the appropriate sanction is suspension for a period of nine months.
FACTS
In 1986, Respondent represented Frances and William Pickles in a real estate closing on a Myrtle Beach condominium. Thereafter, the Pickles rented the condo to one Vicki Curran.
In April, 1987, Curran failed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In the Matter of NidaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of BallardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Matter of HollerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- In Re DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- In Re MatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- In Re CharlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001