Legal Opinion
Penermon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 11, 2014No. Case No.: 14-cv-00065-KAWPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*986ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO DISMISS
(Dkt. No. 14)
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, United States Magistrate Judge
On February 24, 2014, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Charlotte Penermon’s first amended complaint alleging that Wells Fargo violated the California Homeowner Bill of Rights (hereafter “HBOR”).
On April 17, 2014, the Court held a hearing, and after careful consideration of the parties arguments and the applicable legal authority, for the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Johnson v. PNC MortgageDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Rossetta v. CitiMortgage, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- McShannock v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Wieck v. CIT Grp., Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
- Clinton v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.