Johnson v. PNC Mortgage
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ECF No. 32]
LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge
INTRODUCTION
This case involves a residential mortgage loan. Plaintiffs Charlotte and Nelvin Johnson allege that, in handling their requests for a loan modification, the defendants violated California’s Homeowner Bill of Rights.
The Johnsons sued PNC Mortgage and U.S. Bank in Napa County Superior Court. (Compl.-ECF No. 1 at 5-21.)1 PNC removed the case to this court based on diversity jurisdiction. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) (When it removed the case, PNC was the only defendant that had been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Saterbak v. JP Morgan Chase Bank CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Rossetta v. CitiMortgage, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Meixner v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Tuan Anh Le v. Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Bermudez v. SN Servicing CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.