Legal Opinion

Norman & Co. v. Edington

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

PROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County.— Joseph W. Sineed, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard

The single question raised by the facts found by the court of chancery appeals in the present case is whether complainants, as assignees of claims for work and labor done in the construction of the Knoxville, La Follette & Jellico Railroad Company, by the employees of an insolvent subcontractor, can enforce a statutory lien for these claims, where their assignors (the employees) had *311failed to give notice to the railroad company of the fact that they relied upon this lien for the security of,these claims, but subsequent to the assignments the' complainants themselves, as such assignees, gave…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greenhood and Others v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Duncan v. HawnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Union Trust Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Couper v. GabouryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1895
  5. Perry v. Duluth Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Interurban Const. Co. v. Central State Bank of KieferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Groth v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Berry v. ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API