Legal Opinion
Greenhood and Others v. Randall
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 5, 1884PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
111 U.S. 775
4 S.Ct. 699
28 L.Ed. 596
GREENHOOD and others
v.
RANDALL.
May 5, 1884.
Edwin W. Toole, for plaintiff in error.
S. Shellabarger and J. M. Wilson, for defendant in error.
WAITE, C. J.
1
This judgment is affirmed. The record fails entirely to present in proper form any of the questions which have been argued for the plaintiff in error. Affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burnham v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. BurtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Greenwood v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
3Cited by60 opinions
- In Re Penn Central Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Bowen v. HockleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Berthold-Jennings Lumber Co. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. DoudCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Rector v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.