Legal Opinion

Union Trust Co. v. Walker

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 12, 1883No. 1150PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern. jDistriet of Illinois.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Cheer Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case differs from Union Trust Company v. Souther, ante, p. 591, only in the fact that Walker, the present intervenor and appellee, is the assignee by purchase' from- the original holders of the claims he seeks to have paid, and one of the questions certified is whether, being an assignee and not an original holder, he is entitled to payment. We have ho hesitation in answering this question in the affirmative. As was said in Fosdick v. Schall, 99 U. S. 235, 253, these creditors are paid not because they have in law a lien on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Burnham v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. In re BennettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  3. Carlisle v. Mercantile Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  4. Union Trust Co. v. Southern Sawmills & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908
  5. Blair v. St. Louis, H. & K. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API