Legal Opinion
Doe v. Ronan
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 2010No. 2009-2104PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*189Cupp, J.
{¶ 1} This case comes to us as two certified questions of state law from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that contractual obligations in administrative-employment contracts entered into by school districts governed by R.C. Chapter 124 are not impaired by R.C. 3319.391 and Ohio Adm.Code 3301-20-01, and R.C. 3319.391 is not a retroactive law.
I. Facts
{¶ 2} According to the order certifying the questions to this court and the facts agreed upon by the parties in their briefs, John Doe,1…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Middletown v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. LaSalleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LaSalleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Bell v. Northern Ohio Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948
- Holdeman v. EppersonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- ISHA, Inc. v. RisserOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Becker v. Direct Energy, LPOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- City of Athens v. TestaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Akron City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Civ. Serv. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- City of Athens v. TestaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.