Legal Opinion

Bell v. Northern Ohio Telephone Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1948No. 31137PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

An action for damages for the breach of-a contract validly made is not before us.

It is elementary that no valid contract may be made contrary to statute, and that valid, applicable statutory provisions are parts of every contract. Public utility service in this state is regulated by statute and no contract for service may be made by a public-utility except as provided by statute. The only contract which a public utility is authorized to enter into with a customer for service must conform to the schedule filed by such utility in compliance with Section 614-16, General Code, or changed in…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Glyco v. SchultzSylvania Municipal Court · 1972
  2. Holdeman v. EppersonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Am. Family Ins. Co. v. HoopOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Beder v. Cerha Kitchen & Bath Design Studio, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. DeFoe v. Schoen Builders, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API