Legal Opinion

City of Middletown v. Ferguson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1986No. 85-996PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case the elected representatives of the citizens of Middletown, the city commissioners, carefully conceived a plan to widen and improve Manchester Road. The commissioners diligently and openly passed all necessary legislation to carry their plan to completion. Unfortunately, a significant number of citizens were opposed to the road improvement project. These citizens sought to halt the project by using their reserved initiative power. In this conflict between a city government and its citizens, we must decide whether the initiative ordinance passed by the Middletown voters…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. SchwartzwaldOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. HodgeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. ProgressOhio.org, Inc. v. JobsOhio (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Ohioans for Concealed Carry, Inc. v. Columbus (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API