Legal Opinion

United States v. Pamela M. Manapat

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 18, 1991No. 88-4029PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

Appellee Pamela M. Manapat was indicted for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1001, which prohibits “knowingly and willfully” making false statements to any department or agency of the United States.

I. Background

The case arose after Manapat submitted an application for an Airman Medical Certificate to the Federal Aviation Administration. On the application form, Manapat checked “No” to two questions asking for “Record of traffic convictions” and “Record of other convictions.” In fact, she had been convicted three times prior to filling out the form.

Manapat moved to dismiss the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. Fred J. LighteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Joseph YasakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Joseph BonacorsaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. William P. Reilly, United States of America v. John Patrick DowdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. HatchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. BoskicCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. James M. CullitonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Patrick L. SwindallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API