Legal Opinion

Edward Kruelski, Jr. v. State of Connecticut Superior Court for the Judicial District of Danbury and Geographical Area 3 at Danbury

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 3, 2003No. Docket 01-2394PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge SACK concurs in a separate opinion.

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge.

Edward Kruelski appeals the district court’s (Chatigny, J.) denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Kruelski argues that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution foreclosed his continued prosecution after the Connecticut trial court, at the close of evidence, acquitted him based on an erroneous interpretation of the applicable statute of limitations. We affirm the district court’s denial of the writ.

I

Edward Kruelski was charged in Connecticut State Superior Court for the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Barbara C. Ehrlich v. Town of Glastonbury, Joel White, James KennyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Hoffler v. BezioDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
  3. United States v. DionisioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Chisholm v. United of Omaha Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
  5. Billy Russell Clark v. Tim MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API