Legal Opinion

United States v. Dionisio

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 17, 2007No. Docket 06-0908-crPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Dominick Dionisio appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss a racketeering conspiracy charge that he claims is prohibited by the Double Jeopardy Clause. Dionisio contends that the protections of the Double Jeopardy Clause were triggered when, pursuant to a plea agreement, the court previously dismissed with prejudice another racketeering conspiracy charge against him that was allegedly based on the same offense conduct. Guaranteeing that no person shall “be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb,” U.S.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Evans v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. York v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. State v. Soto (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. United States v. Joseph FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. VargasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API