Legal Opinion
Goldenstern v. Gavin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 2, 1940No. 29306PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.
On May 8, 1937, the defendant in error filed in the district court his action against the plaintiff in error and F. G. Cutsinger for $5,016, damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the wrongful conversion by the defendants of certain pipe line, ownership , of which was claimed by the plaintiff. Summons was issued and served upon the defendants on May 10th and 11th, respectively.
On September 20, 1938, the plaintiff filed an amendment to the petition, and thereafter, on October 24, 1938, filed in the cause his amended petition, in which it is alleged:
“That on or about May 5, 1937,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. ShuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- City of Seminole v. MooringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Wynnewood Cotton Oil Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Phenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn, N.Y. v. CeaphusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. FulsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martha M. Russell, Independent of the Estate of Frank Russell, Deceased v. S. J. SarkeysCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Sarkeys v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Anderson v. BeidlemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Boller v. Sun Valley Shamrock Resources, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1990