Legal Opinion

Tavenner v. Figini

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1975PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This was an action for damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. Defendants appeal from a judgment based upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff for $16,500.

Defendants assign as errors the refusal of the trial court to strike from plaintiff’s complaint allegations that his earning capacity has been permanently impaired and in instructing the jury on impairment of future earning capacity.

Defendants’ argument in support of these assignments of error is summarized by them as follows:

“Defendants contend that evidentiary requirements to support the claim of, and a jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Conachan v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Atlanta Metallic Casket Co. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Creel v. ShadleyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Holder v. PettyOregon Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. ReevesOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. DeVaux v. PresbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Katter v. Jack's Datsun Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Shivers v. RineyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Clinton v. ThornhillOregon Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API