Legal Opinion

Creel v. Shadley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1973PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is an action for assault and battery arising out of an altercation between plaintiff and the four defendants, who are members of the Klamath Indian tribe. A jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for general, special and punitive damages. The defendants appeal from the judgment entered on the verdict. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

The incident occurred on the evening of June 17,1971, in front of a tavern in Chiloquin. Plaintiff, a timber faller and a former police officer in that city, had parked his car in front of the tavern, intending to purchase a six-pack of beer to take…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anthes v. AnthesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  2. State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Skultety v. HumphreysOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Honeycutt v. Wabash Railroad CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Waymire v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Campbell v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. DeVaux v. PresbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Katter v. Jack's Datsun Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Zimmerman v. AuslandOregon Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API