Legal Opinion

Holder v. Petty

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1973PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries to a six-year-old boy who was hit by defendant’s automobile. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict awarding $2,000 in general damages and $300 in special damages.

Plaintiff has assigned as error the refusal of the trial court to give that portion of the Oregon State Bar Uniform Jury Instruction No. 30.02 on general damages which would have instructed the jury that if it found that plaintiff was entitled to damages the items of general damages which it was to consider were to include:

“Such sum as will reasonably compensate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Conachan v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Linn County v. RozelleOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Shaw v. Pacific Supply CooperativeOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Brown v. O.-W. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Fields v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Falk v. AmsberryOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Peterson v. TempleOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Lesniak v. County of BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. Katter v. Jack's Datsun Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Wilson v. B. F. Goodrich Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API