Legal Opinion
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. KFC Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 2014No. B243908; B245119PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Following our decision reversing summary judgment for defendants in Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. McDonald’s Corp. (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 554 [114 Cal.Rptr.3d 414] (PCRM I), the trial court sustained demurrers without leave to amend and dismissed second amended complaints alleging that various chain restaurants serving grilled chicken were in violation of Proposition 65. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
1. The McDonald’s complaint
As we described in PCRM /, in January 2008 appellant Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), self-described as a nonprofit…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Blatty v. New York Times Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Smiley v. CitibankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sciortino v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Bilesky v. Shopko Stores Operating Co., LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Bilesky v. Shopko Stores Operating Co., LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. v. Walmart, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- Council for Education and Research etc. v. Starbucks Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.