Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Sawinski

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 20, 1983No. NMCM 82 4500PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ABERNATHY, Senior Judge:

We had thought that, with the passage of over 13 years since its pronouncement, attempts to experiment with the procedural requirements of United States v. Care, 18 U.S.C.M.A. 535, 40 C.M.R. 247 (1969), had ceased. Unfortunately, we were wrong.

Assigned as error, we are now asked to review the sufficiency of a providence inquiry in which the only relation of the appellant to the facts alleged in the offenses was by way of a stipulation of fact, received in evidence as an appellate exhibit and as to which no questions concerning the substantive content of the stipulation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  5. United States v. TrottierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. SweetU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. EnlowU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. SchraderU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  4. United States v. RollerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. CantuU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API