United States v. Roller
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
REED, Judge:
We have examined the record of trial, the assignments of error,1 and the Govern*1094ment’s reply thereto. We conclude that the assignments of error are without merit. Only the first assignment of error,2 which deals with this Court’s previous interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 793(f), merits discussion.3 Citing our opinion in United States v. Chattin, 33 M.J. 802 (N.M.C.M.R.1991), aff'd, 36 M.J. 374 (C.M.A.1992) (citing United States v. McGuinness, 35 M.J. 149 (C.M.A.1992)), appellant argues he cannot be found guilty of “permitting” the classified information to be removed from its place of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. WeissUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. GrafUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. WimberlyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. McGuinnessUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. SawinskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. SweetU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. ReapU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. RollerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995