Legal Opinion
Aponte v. Sullivan
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 4, 1993No. 92-4586PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES,-District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks review of the Department'of Health and Human Services’ denial of his application for benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42' U.S.C. §§ 401-33. Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is denied.
I. ■ BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Title II of the Social Security Act provides disability benefits for a claimant who demonstrates that he suffers a physical or mental disability within the meaning of the Act and that the disability…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Burks-Marshall v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Terry D. Loudermilk v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Rooney v. ShalalaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Burks-Marshall v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Banks v. ChaterDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.