Legal Opinion
Burks-Marshall v. Shalala
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 8, 1993No. 93-1289PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal of an order issued by the District Court1 in a social-security disability case. The principal question presented has to do with the sufficiency and fairness of the notice that the Social Security Administration at one time used to inform losing claimants of their right to further review. We hold that the claimant in this case has not shown that she relied on the notice or was misled by it. She therefore has no standing to contest the legal sufficiency of the notice, and we affirm.
I
The claimant, Melba Burks-Marshall, initially filed applications…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Miguel GONZALEZ, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant/AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Felix JELINEK, Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Dealy v. HecklerDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
- Butland v. BowenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Gilbert v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Robert TATE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth APFEL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Ronald L. BOOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health & Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Gabriel G. TORRES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Gilbert v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.