Abrams v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The petitioner, David A. Abrams, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court following its denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In substance, the petitioner does not attack the court’s decision denying the habeas petition on the merits of that petition but, rather, attacks the actions of the court on the day of the habeas trial; he requests a new habeas trial. 2 On appeal, the petitioner specifically claims that the court acted improperly (1) by failing to conduct a sufficient inquiry into…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Phillips v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Richardson v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. CrespoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. BunkleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cammarota v. GuerreraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Sinchak v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Abrams v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Abrams v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010