Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fant v. Clerk of Courts

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1992No. 91-538PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The court of appeals stated no reasons for its action in dismissing the complaint. However, it sustained the motion to dismiss which contended that under Civ.R. 12(B)(6) appellant’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The rule provides:

“Every defense, in law or fact, to a claim for relief in any pleading, * * * shall be asserted in the responsive pleading thereto * * *, except that the following defenses may at the option of the pleader be made by motion: * * * (6) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted * * *.”

Procedurally, the action was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Scanlon v. DetersOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State ex rel. Hastings Mutual Insurance v. MerillatOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Shane v. New Philadelphia Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Karmasu v. TateOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Wood v. McCrystalOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Fant v. East Cleveland Mun. Court ClerkOhio Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API