Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2002No. 2001-1325PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 96 Ohio St.3d 379.] THE STATE EX REL. SHEMO ET AL. v. CITY OF MAYFIELD HEIGHTS ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.,

2002-Ohio-4905.] Motion for reconsideration granted in part and judgment modified in part. (No. 2001-1325—Submitted June 4, 2002—Decided October 2, 2002.) IN MANDAMUS. ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶1} On April 10, 2002, we granted a writ of mandamus to relators, co- owners as trustees of land located in the city of Mayfield Heights, Ohio, to compel respondents, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Doner v. ZodyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State ex rel. Coles v. GranvilleOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Duncan v. Village of MiddlefieldOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State ex rel. Trafalgar Corp. v. Miami County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API