Annone v. Kawasaki Motor Corp.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice:
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the Superior Court properly denied plaintiff leave to amend his complaint.
I
The cause of action arose on May 19, 1970 when plaintiff allegedly sustained personal injuries in a fall from a malfunctioning motorcycle which had been manufactured by defendant Kawasaki Motor Corporation (Kawasaki), a California corporation, and purchased by plaintiff from Delaware Cycle Center.
Approximately six weeks before the end of the limitations period (see 10 Del.C. § 8118), plaintiff filed the complaint against Kawasaki and “David P. Trainer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kerner v. RackmillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
- Meredith v. United Air LinesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1966
- Sanders v. MetzgerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Martz v. Miller Brothers CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1965
- Wentz v. Alberto Culver CompanyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clinton v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Mullen v. Alarmguard of Delmarva, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Chrysler Corp. v. New Castle CountySuperior Court of Delaware · 1983
- Mergenthaler, Inc. v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
- Want v. LeveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.