Legal Opinion

Annone v. Kawasaki Motor Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 5, 1974PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Justice:

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the Superior Court properly denied plaintiff leave to amend his complaint.

I

The cause of action arose on May 19, 1970 when plaintiff allegedly sustained personal injuries in a fall from a malfunctioning motorcycle which had been manufactured by defendant Kawasaki Motor Corporation (Kawasaki), a California corporation, and purchased by plaintiff from Delaware Cycle Center.

Approximately six weeks before the end of the limitations period (see 10 Del.C. § 8118), plaintiff filed the complaint against Kawasaki and “David P. Trainer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kerner v. RackmillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Meredith v. United Air LinesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1966
  3. Sanders v. MetzgerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Martz v. Miller Brothers CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1965
  5. Wentz v. Alberto Culver CompanyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clinton v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  2. Mullen v. Alarmguard of Delmarva, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. New Castle CountySuperior Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. Mergenthaler, Inc. v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  5. Want v. LeveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API