Legal Opinion

Want v. Leve

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1978No. 38309PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Albert Want, the plaintiff in the trial court, appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis entered after the respondents’ motion for judgment on the pleadings had been sustained on the grounds that the five year statute of limitations, § 516.120 RSMo. 1969 had run and the cause of action was thereby barred. The central issue is whether plaintiff’s Third Amended Petition, filed on March 13, 1975, relates back to the commencement of the cause of action and thereby avoids the limitations bar. For reasons hereinafter stated we hold that it did and the judgment of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Davis v. L. L. Cohen & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Malcolm Simmons and Doris Simmons v. Teresa D. Fenton and James L. GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  3. Lomax Ex Rel. Lomax v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Milner v. National School of Health TechnologyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Adams v. Beland Realty CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wooldridge v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
  2. Kennon v. Citizens Mutual Insurance-Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Atkinson v. Be-Mac Transport, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Kilgore v. KilgoreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Boone County v. County Employees' Retirement FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API