Legal Opinion

Clinton v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 29, 2009No. 208, 2009PublishedCited by 198 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

The plaintiff-appellant, Richard Clinton, appeals from the judgments of the Superi- or Court dismissing his personal injury action against the defendants-appellees, Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. (“Enterprise”) and Anthony Gene Shamblin, pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 12(b)(6). 1 Clinton makes three arguments on appeal. First, he contends that the Superior Court erred in applying Delaware’s statute of limitations to this action, instead of Maryland’s. Second, he contends that the Superior Court erred in finding that Maryland courts would have dismissed his claim under Rule…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. VLIW TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. In Re General Motors (Hughes) Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  3. Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  4. White v. PanicSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by198 opinions

  1. Price v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  2. Deuley v. DynCorp International, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  3. In Re Volcano Corporation Stockholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
  4. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. ArteagaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  5. Scott Pontone v. Milso Industries CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014

193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API