Legal Opinion

Smith v. Condux International, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 19, 1991No. C4-90-1492Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a post-judgment temporary injunction and an order denying appellants’ motion to vacate that injunction. After judgment was entered and an appeal was filed, respondents brought a show cause motion accusing appellants of contempt for violating the terms of the permanent injunction that was part of the final judgment. After a hearing, the court found that appellants had violated the permanent injunction, but rather than hold appellants in contempt, the court issued a temporary injunction. Appellants brought a motion to vacate the temporary injunction.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API