State v. Arnold
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dickinson District Court. — Hon. W. B. Qttarton, Judge. The defendant was indicted for keeping and maintaining a nuisance by the sale of intoxicating liquors. He pleaded not guilty. A trial was had, which resulted in a verdict against him, and from a judgment on the verdict he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBothrock, C. J.
1 I. It is averred in the indictment that, “the defendant, on the first day of August, 1893, * * * and on divers other days and times, between the first day of August, 1893, and the finding of this indictment, * * * did erect, establish, and continue and use a building, erection, and place, with, intent and for the purpose then and there and therein to sell intoxicating liquor, contrary to law. * * *” It is urged in behalf of the appellant, that the time laid in the indictment as beginning on the first day of August, 1893, is descriptive of the offense, and that it was error to allow any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- State v. IllsleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- State v. McCombSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- State v. JaponeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- State v. Van AukenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- State v. DunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- State v. DufourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.