Cronauer v. Bayer
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
Adolph Bayer, appellant herein and one of the defendants in a judgment entered against him and Adam Bayer by Nicholas Cronauer, has appealed from an order of the court below discharging his rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened as to appellant.
The ground assigned for opening was that appellant’s purported signature to the note upon which the judgment was confessed is a forgery, and that appellant had no knowledge of the existence of the note or judgment until a scire facias issued to revive the latter was served upon him. The rule was discharged…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shannon v. CastnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. WalukiewiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Austen v. MarzolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Edwards v. Western Maryland Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Kemper v. RichardsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Manson v. First National Bank in IndianaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- United Pacific Ins. Co. v. Lamanna's EstateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Canter v. CanterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Peoples National Bank v. WeingartnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943