Meyer v. Alliance Investment Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the First District Court of Jersey City.
1Opinion of the Court
*451Tlio opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
The plaintiffs leased property to de Jong by a written lease which contained a covenant to pay the rent and a covenant not to assign without the written consent of the lessors. The lessors did consent in writing to an assignment by de Jong to the defendant. .This consent was subject to all the terms, conditions and covenants contained in the lease. Subsequently, the defendant reassigned to de J ong, hut to this assignment there was no written consent. This action is for rent that accrued after the attempted reassignment. The defence is that…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Penelko, Inc. v. John Price Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
- S. T. McKnight Co. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Seeburger v. CohenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- First American National Bank of Nashville v. Chicken System of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Packard-Bamberger & Co., Inc. v. MaloofNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.