Legal Opinion
Toth v. Arason
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 12, 2006No. A04-769PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
Appellant David Toth sued respondent Gerald Arason individually and d/b/a Ara-son’s Body Shop for breach of contract, deceptive trade practices, and violations of MinmStat. §§ 325F.60 (2004), and 325F.63 (2004), which are part of the Truth in Repairs Act, and Minn.Stat. § 325F.69 (2004), which is part of the Consumer Fraud Act. Toth’s claims were based on repairs Arason made to Toth’s pickup truck after the truck sustained damage in an accident. After a court trial, the district court awarded Toth damages based on Arason’s use of a radiator that was not original…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rohmiller v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Brisbin v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Swanson v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Swanson v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Toth v. ArasonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006