McCardell v. McNay
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Morris District Court. The only question submitted upon the record here, is, whether plaintiffs in error were- entitled to a trial by jury. The facts upon which the question arises, are fully set forth in the opinion. The district court, at the October Term 1874, refused to impannel a jury, and thereupon tried the case, and gave judgment for McNay, plaintiff. The defendants bring the record here for review.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
On the 9 th of September 1874, defendant in error filed his petition in the district court of Morris county, against plaintiffs .in error and one F. M. Chase, alleging, that he had obtained a judgment against H. H. McCardell (one of the plaintiffs in error) for a certain sum, before a justice of the peace; that the justice before whom said judgment was obtained was legally qualified, etc.; that he (defendant in error) filed a transcript of said judgment in the office of the clerk of the district court, according to law, on the 30th of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by12 opinions
- McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Wat-Tah-Noh-Zhe v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Rich v. BowkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Fisher v. RakestrawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Cole v. DrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.