Legal Opinion

Marks v. Taylor

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1901PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On rebearing.

1Opinion of the CourtBaskin, J.

At a previous term we affirmed tbe judgment of tbe lower court in tbis case. Tbe opinion tben delivered is reported in 63 Pac. 897. Tbe appellants made a motion for a rebearing, wbieb was granted. Tbe facts are fully stated in tbe former opinion. :Tbe facts pertinent to tbe present bearing are as follows: A mortgage executed by appellants to tbe respondent to secure a promissory note was foreclosed in tbe court below, and at tbe sale of tbe real property described in tbe mortgage tbe respondent purchased tbe same, and after tbe expiration of tbe time for redemption tbe sheriff executed to her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quivey v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Conyers v. MericlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Marks v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ethridge v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Fisher v. VillamilSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  3. Alfalfa Lumber Co. v. MudgettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Egelund v. FayterUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Nordfors v. Knight Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API