Legal Opinion

Ethridge v. Perryman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 14, 1963No. 49131PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, Commissioner.

This is a suit in equity to reform a deed of trust to include three parcels of land instead of one, on the ground of mutual mistake of fact; to foreclose the reformed instrument, and cancel deeds to the other two parcels. Plaintiffs Lee Ethridge and wife are the beneficiaries named in the deed of trust. Defendants Hershel and Myrtle Perryman, husband and wife, are grantors of the deed of trust and of the deeds to the other two parcels. Defendant T. Victor Jeffries is the trustee named in the deed of trust. Defendant Stacy Perryman, father of Hershel, is the grantee named…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Shepard v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Walters v. TuckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Dougherty v. DoughertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. Conyers v. MericlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ethridge v. Tierone BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. Bayne v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. Bourne Ex Rel. Bourne v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Allen v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Schimmel Fur Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API